Reedle Откройте в мобильном приложении
Понятно
Понятно
Для того чтобы воспользоваться закладками, необходимо
Войти или зарегистрироваться
Отмена
Для того чтобы воспользоваться озвучкой предложений, необходимо
Войти или зарегистрироваться
Отмена
Озвучка предложений доступна при наличии PRO-доступа
Купить PRO-доступ
Отмена
"
Mine
is
as
stupid
as
yours
–
but
I
don
’
t
let
it
rule
my
brain
.
I
can
at
least
see
the
beauty
of
Mike
’
s
attempt
to
devise
an
ideal
human
ethic
and
applaud
his
recognition
that
such
a
code
must
be
founded
on
ideal
sexual
behavior
,
even
though
it
calls
for
changes
in
sexual
mores
so
radical
as
to
frighten
most
people
–
including
you
.
For
that
I
admire
him
–
I
should
nominate
him
for
the
Philosophical
Society
.
Most
moral
philosophers
consciously
or
unconsciously
assume
the
essential
correctness
of
our
cultural
sexual
code
–
family
,
monogamy
,
continence
,
the
postulate
of
privacy
that
troubled
you
so
,
restriction
of
intercourse
to
the
marriage
bed
,
et
cetera
.
Having
stipulated
our
cultural
code
as
a
whole
,
they
fiddle
with
details
–
even
such
piffle
as
solemnly
discussing
whether
or
not
the
female
breast
is
an
‘
obscene
’
sight
!
But
mostly
they
debate
how
the
human
animal
can
be
induced
or
forced
to
obey
this
code
,
blandly
ignoring
the
high
probability
that
the
heartaches
and
tragedies
they
see
all
around
them
originate
in
the
code
itself
rather
than
failure
to
abide
by
the
code
.
"
Now
comes
the
Man
from
Mars
,
looks
at
this
sacrosanct
code
–
and
rejects
it
in
toto
.
I
do
not
grasp
exactly
what
Mike
’
s
sexual
code
is
,
but
it
is
clear
from
what
little
you
told
me
that
it
violates
the
laws
of
every
major
nation
on
Earth
and
would
outrage
‘
right
-
thinking
’
people
of
every
major
faith
–
and
most
agnostics
and
atheists
,
too
.
And
yet
this
poor
boy
-
"
Отключить рекламу
"
Jubal
,
I
repeat
–
he
’
s
not
a
boy
,
he
’
s
a
man
"
"
Is
he
a
‘
man
?
’
I
wonder
.
This
poor
ersatz
Martian
is
saying
,
by
your
own
report
,
that
sex
is
a
way
to
be
happy
together
.
I
go
along
with
Mike
this
far
:
sex
should
be
a
means
of
happiness
.
The
worst
thing
about
sex
is
that
we
use
it
to
hurt
each
other
.
It
ought
never
to
hurt
;
it
should
bring
happiness
,
or
,
at
the
very
least
,
pleasure
.
There
is
no
good
reason
why
it
should
ever
be
anything
less
.
"
The
code
says
,
‘
Thou
shalt
not
covet
thy
neighbor
’
s
wife
’
–
and
the
result
?
Reluctant
chastity
,
adultery
,
jealousy
,
bitter
family
fights
,
blows
and
sometimes
murder
,
broken
homes
and
twisted
children
?
and
furtive
,
dirty
little
passes
at
country
club
dances
and
the
like
,
degrading
to
both
man
and
woman
whether
consummated
or
not
,
Is
this
injunction
ever
obeyed
?
The
Commandment
not
to
‘
covet
’
I
mean
;
I
’
m
not
referring
to
any
physical
act
.
I
wonder
.
If
a
man
swore
to
me
on
a
stack
of
his
own
Bibles
that
he
had
refrained
from
coveting
another
man
’
s
wife
because
the
code
forbade
it
,
I
would
suspect
either
self
-
deception
or
subnormal
sexuality
.
Any
male
virile
enough
to
sire
a
child
is
almost
certainly
so
virile
that
he
has
coveted
many
,
many
women
–
whether
he
takes
action
in
the
matter
or
not
.
"
Now
comes
Mike
and
says
:
‘
There
’
s
no
need
for
you
to
covet
my
wife
?
love
her
!
There
’
s
no
limit
to
her
love
,
we
all
have
everything
to
gain
–
and
nothing
to
lose
but
fear
and
guilt
and
hatred
and
jealousy
.
’
The
proposition
is
so
naive
that
it
’
s
incredible
.
Отключить рекламу
So
far
as
I
recall
only
precivilization
Eskimos
were
ever
this
naive
–
and
they
were
so
remote
from
the
rest
of
us
that
they
almost
qualified
as
‘
Men
from
Mars
’
themselves
.
However
,
we
soon
gave
them
our
virtues
and
instead
of
happy
sharing
they
now
have
chastity
and
adultery
just
like
the
rest
of
us
–
those
who
survived
the
transition
.
I
wonder
if
they
gained
by
it
?
What
do
you
think
,
"
I
wouldn
’
t
care
to
be
an
Eskimo
.
thank
you
.
"
"
Neither
would
I
.
Spoiled
raw
fish
makes
me
bilious
.
"