Reedle Откройте в мобильном приложении
Понятно
Понятно
Для того чтобы воспользоваться закладками, необходимо
Войти или зарегистрироваться
Отмена
Для того чтобы воспользоваться озвучкой предложений, необходимо
Войти или зарегистрироваться
Отмена
Озвучка предложений доступна при наличии PRO-доступа
Купить PRO-доступ
Отмена
Then
,
again
,
in
1825
,
Bernard
Germain
,
Count
de
Lacepede
,
a
great
naturalist
,
published
a
scientific
systemized
whale
book
,
wherein
are
several
pictures
of
the
different
species
of
the
Leviathan
.
All
these
are
not
only
incorrect
,
but
the
picture
of
the
Mysticetus
or
Greenland
whale
(
that
is
to
say
the
Right
whale
)
,
even
Scoresby
,
a
long
experienced
man
as
touching
that
species
,
declares
not
to
have
its
counterpart
in
nature
.
But
the
placing
of
the
cap-sheaf
to
all
this
blundering
business
was
reserved
for
the
scientific
Frederick
Cuvier
,
brother
to
the
famous
Baron
.
In
1836
,
he
published
a
Natural
History
of
Whales
,
in
which
he
gives
what
he
calls
a
picture
of
the
Sperm
Whale
.
Before
showing
that
picture
to
any
Nantucketer
,
you
had
best
provide
for
your
summary
retreat
from
Nantucket
.
In
a
word
,
Frederick
Cuvier
's
Sperm
Whale
is
not
a
Sperm
Whale
,
but
a
squash
.
Of
course
,
he
never
had
the
benefit
of
a
whaling
voyage
(
such
men
seldom
have
)
,
but
whence
he
derived
that
picture
,
who
can
tell
?
Perhaps
he
got
it
as
his
scientific
predecessor
in
the
same
field
,
Desmarest
,
got
one
of
his
authentic
abortions
;
that
is
,
from
a
Chinese
drawing
.
And
what
sort
of
lively
lads
with
the
pencil
those
Chinese
are
,
many
queer
cups
and
saucers
inform
us
.
As
for
the
sign-painters
'
whales
seen
in
the
streets
hanging
over
the
shops
of
oil-dealers
,
what
shall
be
said
of
them
?
They
are
generally
Richard
III
.
whales
,
with
dromedary
humps
,
and
very
savage
;
breakfasting
on
three
or
four
sailor
tarts
,
that
is
whaleboats
full
of
mariners
:
their
deformities
floundering
in
seas
of
blood
and
blue
paint
.
Отключить рекламу
But
these
manifold
mistakes
in
depicting
the
whale
are
not
so
very
surprising
after
all
.
Consider
!
Most
of
the
scientific
drawings
have
been
taken
from
the
stranded
fish
;
and
these
are
about
as
correct
as
a
drawing
of
a
wrecked
ship
,
with
broken
back
,
would
correctly
represent
the
noble
animal
itself
in
all
its
undashed
pride
of
hull
and
spars
.
Though
elephants
have
stood
for
their
full-lengths
,
the
living
Leviathan
has
never
yet
fairly
floated
himself
for
his
portrait
.
The
living
whale
,
in
his
full
majesty
and
significance
,
is
only
to
be
seen
at
sea
in
unfathomable
waters
;
and
afloat
the
vast
bulk
of
him
is
out
of
sight
,
like
a
launched
line-of-battle
ship
;
and
out
of
that
element
it
is
a
thing
eternally
impossible
for
mortal
man
to
hoist
him
bodily
into
the
air
,
so
as
to
preserve
all
his
mighty
swells
and
undulations
.
And
,
not
to
speak
of
the
highly
presumable
difference
of
contour
between
a
young
suckling
whale
and
a
full-grown
Platonian
Leviathan
;
yet
,
even
in
the
case
of
one
of
those
young
sucking
whales
hoisted
to
a
ship
's
deck
,
such
is
then
the
outlandish
,
eel-like
,
limbered
,
varying
shape
of
him
,
that
his
precise
expression
the
devil
himself
could
not
catch
.
But
it
may
be
fancied
,
that
from
the
naked
skeleton
of
the
stranded
whale
,
accurate
hints
may
be
derived
touching
his
true
form
.
Not
at
all
.
For
it
is
one
of
the
more
curious
things
about
this
Leviathan
,
that
his
skeleton
gives
very
little
idea
of
his
general
shape
.
Though
Jeremy
Bentham
's
skeleton
,
which
hangs
for
candelabra
in
the
library
of
one
of
his
executors
,
correctly
conveys
the
idea
of
a
burly-browed
utilitarian
old
gentleman
,
with
all
Jeremy
's
other
leading
personal
characteristics
;
yet
nothing
of
this
kind
could
be
inferred
from
any
leviathan
's
articulated
bones
.
In
fact
,
as
the
great
Hunter
says
,
the
mere
skeleton
of
the
whale
bears
the
same
relation
to
the
fully
invested
and
padded
animal
as
the
insect
does
to
the
chrysalis
that
so
roundingly
envelopes
it
.
This
peculiarity
is
strikingly
evinced
in
the
head
,
as
in
some
part
of
this
book
will
be
incidentally
shown
.
It
is
also
very
curiously
displayed
in
the
side
fin
,
the
bones
of
which
almost
exactly
answer
to
bones
of
the
human
hand
,
minus
only
the
thumb
.
This
fin
has
four
regular
bone-fingers
,
the
index
,
middle
,
ring
,
and
little
finger
.
But
all
these
are
permanently
lodged
in
their
fleshy
covering
,
as
the
human
fingers
in
an
artificial
covering
.
"
However
recklessly
the
whale
may
sometimes
serve
us
,
"
said
humorous
Stubb
one
day
,
"
he
can
never
be
truly
said
to
handle
us
without
mittens
.
"
For
all
these
reasons
,
then
,
any
way
you
may
look
at
it
,
you
must
needs
conclude
that
the
great
Leviathan
is
that
one
creature
in
the
world
which
much
remain
unpainted
to
the
last
True
,
one
portrait
may
hit
the
mark
much
nearer
than
another
,
but
none
can
hit
it
with
any
very
considerable
degree
of
exactness
.
So
there
is
no
earthly
way
of
finding
out
precisely
what
the
whale
really
looks
like
.
And
the
only
mode
in
which
you
can
derive
even
a
tolerable
idea
of
his
living
contour
,
is
by
going
a
whaling
yourself
;
but
by
so
doing
,
you
run
no
small
risk
of
being
eternally
stove
and
sunk
by
him
.
Wherefore
,
it
seems
to
me
you
had
best
not
be
too
fastidious
in
your
curiosity
touching
this
Leviathan
.
Отключить рекламу
In
connexion
with
the
monstrous
pictures
of
whales
,
I
am
strongly
tempted
here
to
enter
upon
those
still
more
monstrous
stories
of
them
which
are
to
be
found
in
certain
books
,
both
ancient
and
modern
,
especially
in
Pliny
,
Purchas
,
Hackluyt
,
Harris
,
Cuvier
,
&
c
.
But
I
pass
that
matter
by
.
I
know
of
only
four
published
outlines
of
the
great
Sperm
Whale
;
Colnett
's
,
Huggins
's
,
Frederick
Cuvier
's
,
and
Beale
's
.
In
the
previous
chapter
Colnett
and
Cuvier
have
been
referred
to
.
Huggins
's
is
far
better
than
theirs
;
but
,
by
great
odds
,
Beale
's
is
the
best
.
All
Beale
's
drawings
of
this
whale
are
good
,
excepting
the
middle
figure
in
the
picture
of
three
whales
in
various
attitudes
,
capping
his
second
chapter
.
His
frontispiece
,
boats
attacking
Sperm
Whales
,
though
no
doubt
calculated
to
excite
the
civil
scepticism
of
some
parlor
men
,
is
admirably
correct
and
life-like
in
its
general
effect
.
Some
of
the
Sperm
Whale
drawings
in
J.
Ross
Browne
are
pretty
correct
in
contour
;
but
they
are
wretchedly
engraved
.
That
is
not
his
fault
though
.
Of
the
Right
Whale
,
the
best
outline
pictures
are
in
Scoresby
;
but
they
are
drawn
on
too
small
a
scale
to
convey
a
desirable
impression
.
He
has
but
one
picture
of
whaling
scenes
,
and
this
is
a
sad
deficiency
,
because
it
is
by
such
pictures
only
,
when
at
all
well
done
,
that
you
can
derive
anything
like
a
truthful
idea
of
the
living
whale
as
seen
by
his
living
hunters
.