Reedle Откройте в мобильном приложении
Понятно
Понятно
Для того чтобы воспользоваться закладками, необходимо
Войти или зарегистрироваться
Отмена
Для того чтобы воспользоваться озвучкой предложений, необходимо
Войти или зарегистрироваться
Отмена
Озвучка предложений доступна при наличии PRO-доступа
Купить PRO-доступ
Отмена
91
There
is
one
puzzling
thing
about
these
prehistoric
memories
of
mine
.
It
is
the
vagueness
of
the
time
element
.
I
lo
not
always
know
the
order
of
events
;
or
can
I
tell
,
between
some
events
,
whether
one
,
two
,
or
four
or
five
years
have
elapsed
.
I
can
only
roughly
tell
the
passage
of
time
by
judging
the
changes
in
the
appearance
and
pursuits
of
my
fellows
.
92
Also
,
I
can
apply
the
logic
of
events
to
the
various
happenings
.
For
instance
,
there
is
no
doubt
whatever
that
my
mother
and
I
were
treed
by
the
wild
pigs
and
fled
and
fell
in
the
days
before
I
made
the
acquaintance
of
Lop
-
Ear
,
who
became
what
I
may
call
my
boyhood
chum
.
And
it
is
just
as
conclusive
that
between
these
two
periods
I
must
have
left
my
mother
.
93
I
have
no
memory
of
my
father
than
the
one
I
have
given
.
Never
,
in
the
years
that
followed
,
did
he
reappear
.
And
from
my
knowledge
of
the
times
,
the
only
explanation
possible
lies
in
that
he
perished
shortly
after
the
adventure
with
the
wild
pigs
.
That
it
must
have
been
an
untimely
end
,
there
is
no
discussion
.
He
was
in
full
vigor
,
and
only
sudden
and
violent
death
could
have
taken
him
off
.
But
I
know
not
the
manner
of
his
going
whether
he
was
drowned
in
the
river
,
or
was
swallowed
by
a
snake
,
or
went
into
the
stomach
of
old
Saber
-
Tooth
,
the
tiger
,
is
beyond
my
knowledge
.
Отключить рекламу
94
For
know
that
I
remember
only
the
things
I
saw
myself
,
with
my
own
eyes
,
in
those
prehistoric
days
.
If
my
mother
knew
my
father
s
end
,
she
never
told
me
.
For
that
matter
I
doubt
if
she
had
a
vocabulary
adequate
to
convey
such
information
.
Perhaps
,
all
told
,
the
Folk
in
that
day
had
a
vocabulary
of
thirty
or
forty
sounds
.
95
I
call
them
SOUNDS
,
rather
than
WORDS
,
because
sounds
they
were
primarily
.
They
had
no
fixed
values
,
to
be
altered
by
adjectives
and
adverbs
.
These
latter
were
tools
of
speech
not
yet
invented
.
Instead
of
qualifying
nouns
or
verbs
by
the
use
of
adjectives
and
adverbs
,
we
qualified
sounds
by
intonation
,
by
changes
in
quantity
and
pitch
,
by
retarding
and
by
accelerating
.
The
length
of
time
employed
in
the
utterance
of
a
particular
sound
shaded
its
meaning
.
96
We
had
no
conjugation
.
One
judged
the
tense
by
the
context
.
We
talked
only
concrete
things
because
we
thought
only
concrete
things
.
Also
,
we
depended
largely
on
pantomime
.
The
simplest
abstraction
was
practically
beyond
our
thinking
;
and
when
one
did
happen
to
think
one
,
he
was
hard
put
to
communicate
it
to
his
fellows
.
There
were
no
sounds
for
it
.
He
was
pressing
beyond
the
limits
of
his
vocabulary
.
If
he
invented
sounds
for
it
,
his
fellows
did
not
understand
the
sounds
.
Then
it
was
that
he
fell
back
on
pantomime
,
illustrating
the
thought
wherever
possible
and
at
the
same
time
repeating
the
new
sound
over
and
over
again
.
97
Thus
language
grew
.
By
the
few
sounds
we
possessed
we
were
enabled
to
think
a
short
distance
beyond
those
sounds
;
then
came
the
need
for
new
sounds
wherewith
to
express
the
new
thought
.
Sometimes
,
however
,
we
thought
too
long
a
distance
in
advance
of
our
sounds
,
managed
to
achieve
abstractions
(
dim
ones
I
grant
)
,
which
we
failed
utterly
to
make
known
to
other
folk
.
After
all
,
language
did
not
grow
fast
in
that
day
.
Отключить рекламу
98
Oh
,
believe
me
,
we
were
amazingly
simple
.
But
we
did
know
a
lot
that
is
not
known
to
-
day
.
99
We
could
twitch
our
ears
,
prick
them
up
and
flatten
them
down
at
will
.
And
we
could
scratch
between
our
shoulders
with
ease
.
We
could
throw
stones
with
our
feet
.
I
have
done
it
many
a
time
.
And
for
that
matter
,
I
could
keep
my
knees
straight
,
bend
forward
from
the
hips
,
and
touch
,
not
the
tips
of
my
fingers
,
but
the
points
of
my
elbows
,
to
the
ground
.
And
as
for
bird
-
nesting
well
,
I
only
wish
the
twentieth
-
century
boy
could
see
us
.
But
we
made
no
collections
of
eggs
.
We
ate
them
.
100
I
remember
but
I
out
-
run
my
story
.
First
let
me
tell
of
Lop
-
Ear
and
our
friendship
.
Very
early
in
my
life
,
I
separated
from
my
mother
.
Possibly
this
was
because
,
after
the
death
of
my
father
,
she
took
to
herself
a
second
husband
.
I
have
few
recollections
of
him
,
and
they
are
not
of
the
best
.
He
was
a
light
fellow
.
There
was
no
solidity
to
him
.
He
was
too
voluble
.
His
infernal
chattering
worries
me
even
now
as
I
think
of
it
.
His
mind
was
too
inconsequential
to
permit
him
to
possess
purpose
.
Monkeys
in
their
cages
always
remind
me
of
him
.
He
was
monkeyish
.
That
is
the
best
description
I
can
give
of
him
.